|
| Thursday, October 7 | |||||
Special to ESPN.com | ||||||
Midnight Madness is one week away. For all your burning questions about college basketball, let the Word's Answer Man be your guide. If you want to send a question to the Word, click here and check back each week to see if your question was answered.
I enjoy The Weekly Word for its insightful analysis and objective reports on NCAA basketball. But what gives? I've read two glaringly opposite accounts about the skill level of Connecticut's recent recruit Scott Hazelton. The Weekly Word assesses a skill level of "project." The Connecticut papers consider the 6-foot-8 small forward to be among one of the top 20 high school players in the nation. Which should I believe?
Ben, take your pick. I based my opinion on what I saw from Hazelton this summer. I thought he was a decent player but not an impact forward at the Big East level. He struggled to get his shot off on his own. He was active but seemed limited. But Connecticut has had success in developing similar players. Remember, Jake Voskuhl wasn't a household name in recruiting when he signed with Connecticut. Hazelton had a better ranking prior to the summer. I'm just not caught up in any Husky-mania over his commitment.
What happened to Winston Bennett? He played at Kentucky and in the NBA.
I know that he went with Rick Pitino to the Celtics but his name was not
listed as an assistant last year. Love your work, can't get enough!
Unfortunately, I can't tell you where Bennett has landed. If we find him, we'll let you know. Keep reading! In your recent column you stated that odds are that Jason Richardson would not be at Michigan State's first practice on Oct. 16. It is my understanding that even with an unsuccessful appeal on the NCAA core course decision, Richardson is still a partial qualifier and is eligible to stay on scholarship and practice with the team. Do you have different information?
Charles, you are correct. It was a bit unclear at first on Richardson's status but Michigan State has confirmed that he can practice on Oct. 16. His appeal probably won't be answered for weeks, so his eligibility status won't be known by the first practice. What is the status Zach Marbury? Is he still playing for Rhode Island?
Definitely. In fact, Marbury will likely start at the point for the Rams. Marbury was ruled ineligible at the start of last season, after practicing for a month. The Rams desperately need him to push the ball, as their only other play-making threat is Tip Vinson. You stated earlier that Desmond Allison would start inside for UK and you stated that the SEC was the deepest and most talented conference in the nation. If this is so, then how is UK going to win with a guard at power forward? You must remember Desmond is only 6-foot-6, 206 pounds and wouldn't you think UK's starting lineup would look better with Jules Camara and Jamaal Magloire at post? I personally don't think much of Tayshuan Prince and I see him coming off the bench.
Chad, Jules Camara and Jamaal Magloire will likely log time together and push Allison down to the wing with Saul Smith and Tayshaun Prince on the perimeter. You may not be a fan of Prince but Kentucky loves him and believes he'll be its top scorer. Is there any chance of a mid-major conference ever becoming a major conference? What would it take? Specifically, I'm thinking about the Mid-American Conference, which seems to attract some good talent (Dan Majerle, Ron Harper, Gary Trent, Wally Szczerbiak, etc.) but can never get over the hump and become a strong conference. Last year, MAC teams put up big non-conference wins, which most likely just scares the big boys off a little and makes it tougher for MAC schools to get that big win and make a name for themselves. Temple and UMass seemed to resurrect the Atlantic 10 by going out and playing anybody, anytime, anywhere. Is that what it takes? Is it even possible with the tradition and power structure within NCAA hoops, where big-name schools and coaches always get top-notch talent? Or can a commissioner with a plan change the landscape?
The reason the A-10 was able to get to high-major status is largely because of its location. Once the A-10 had nationally competitive teams, the markets helped make it a higher-profile league. The A-10 stretches into Cincinnati, Philadelphia, New York and Washington D.C. The MAC is mostly in smaller Midwestern cities. Having a team reach the Final Four would certainly help the conference's status. But Gonzaga's run to the Elite Eight didn't suddenly make the West Coast Conference a high-major conference. Unfortunately, market size (mostly based on television sets) determine what's a high-major or mid-major conference. Andy Katz of the Fresno Bee is a regular contributor to ESPN.com. The Weekly Word on college basketball will be updated on Thursdays throughout the offseason. | ALSO SEE The Weekly Word on college basketball
Have a question for the Weekly Word?
|